打印

作者

Torill Nyseth;Tomás Demetrio Ventura López

来源

CITIES,Vol.119,Issue1,Article 103389

语言

英文

关键字

Institutional innovation;Democracy;Advisory councils;Integration

作者单位

The Arctic University of Norway, Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences, and Education, Department of Social Science, Norway;Uit, The Arctic university of Norway, Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences, and Education, Department of Social Science, Norway;The Arctic University of Norway, Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences, and Education, Department of Social Science, Norway;Uit, The Arctic university of Norway, Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences, and Education, Department of Social Science, Norway

摘要

Cities differ widely in how they integrate migrants, even within the same nation state, and this local dimension in integration policies is understudied. One model that a growing number of cities in both Western Europe and North America have been trying out is setting up immigrant councils and other institutional structures to integrate immigrants. Such representation of immigrant interests in local bodies –has accordingly gained more importance. In this paper, we consider two such local consultative bodies focused on immigrant issues in Norway. Drawing on Smith's concept of ‘democratic innovations’ this paper explores the innovative potential in increasing immigrant's political opportunity structure through such institutions and discusses the democratic potential of such boards. The value of consultative bodies like these as a part of cities integration policy is disputed. Much of this contention has to do with their institutional design, as some may end up being ‘institutional ghettos’, while others become catalysts for enhanced participation. We therefore explore how the local context influences the design and performance of such bodies.