打印

作者

Dominic Stead

来源

JOURNAL OF PLANNING LITERATURE,Vol.36,Issue3,P.312–327

语言

英文

关键字

作者单位

1Department of Built Environment, Aalto University, Finland;2Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands

摘要

While many policy tools can be used to develop spatial plans and implement their goals, there have been very few academic attempts to classify and illustrate the whole range of tools available. This article reviews the different ways in which planning tools have been conceptualized to date and highlights a wide variation in their interpretation. Building directly on literature from policy studies, a new classification is put forward which has many potential applications in studying spatial planning governance. As well as distinguishing between four main policy types (nodality, authority, treasure, and organization), the classification differentiates between procedural and substantive tools.