打印

作者

来源

URBAN POLICY AND RESEARCH,Vol.35,Issue1SI,P.44-60

语言

英文

关键字

Consensus planning; transport policy; accessibility

作者单位

[Legacy, Crystal] RMIT Univ, Ctr Urban Res, Sch Global Urban & Social Studies, Melbourne, Vic, Australia. [Curtis, Carey; Scheurer, Jan] Curtin Univ, Sch Built Environm, Perth, WA, Australia. [Scheurer, Jan] RMIT Univ, Sch Global Urban & Social Studies, Melbourne, Vic, Australia. Legacy, C (reprint author), RMIT Univ, Ctr Urban Res, Sch Global Urban & Social Studies, Melbourne, Vic, Australia. E-Mail: crystal.legacy@rmit.edu.au

摘要

Australian cities have observed a "consensus turn" expressed as broad public support of greater accessibility and public transport provision as revealed in metropolitan strategic plans. In contrast large-scale road projects proposed to traverse the inner-city of three major Australian cities reveals an ongoing and deep-seated attachment by some to car-based travel in Australian urban transport planning. Comparative case studies of these three road projects in Melbourne, Sydney and Perth explores the impact that an antagonistic relationship between the state and community has on the culture of transport planning. Through observational insights, policy and media analysis and interviews with community groups, we show that this antagonistic planning culture arises when there is a fracture between metropolitan strategic plan-making and project planning, and when clear channels of communication and deliberation are undermined.