《Experimenting with anarchistic approaches to collaborative planning: The Planning Free School of Chattanooga》
打印
- 作者
- 来源
- JOURNAL OF URBAN AFFAIRS,Vol.39,Issue5,P.635-657
- 语言
- 英文
- 关键字
- PARTICIPATION; INFORMALITY; 21ST-CENTURY; GEOGRAPHIES; CONFLICT; DIALOGUE
- 作者单位
- [Knapp, Courtney E.] Calif State Polytech Univ Pomona, Dept Urban & Reg Planning, Community Dev, Pomona, CA 91768 USA. Knapp, CE (reprint author), Calif State Polytech Univ Pomona, Coll Environm Design, Dept Urban & Reg Planning, 3801 West Temple Ave,Bldg 7-224, Pomona, CA 91768 USA. E-Mail: ceknapp@cpp.edu
- 摘要
- Urban planners have long recognized that collaborative planning processes can lead to more equitable development outcomes. Despite this recognition, calls for greater inclusion, community self-determination, and equitable decision making appear louder than ever before. This study combines narrative and dialogic analysis to examine the transformative impacts and limits of the Planning Free School of Chattanooga, an experimental collaborative planning initiative launched in Chattanooga, Tennessee, to engage historically underrepresented and marginalized residents in local planning conversations and decision making. The Planning Free School model was rooted in anarchistic principles of horizontal, learner-driven engagement, critical self-reflection, capacity building, and antiracist praxis. Over 5 months, 52 workshops, organized as issue-based discussion groups, critical conversations, transformative place-making sessions, and skill shares, were conducted as part of the initiative. The study contends that the planning free school model may hold promise as a collaborative planning model for 4 reasons: (a) its independent, horizontal structure may attract participants who distrusted city staff; (b) the creative, nontraditional format of workshops can help participants reckon with local legacies of violence, exclusion, and uneven development; (c) it can support capacity building through a learner-driven, do-it-yourself curriculum; and (d) its flexibility and radical openness can allow participants to improvise and adapt to evolving political situations.