打印

作者

来源

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION,Vol.83,Issue4,P.346-364

语言

英文

关键字

form-based codes; sustainable development; zoning reform; PLAN QUALITY; DESIGN; REGULATIONS; PROJECTS

作者单位

[Garde, Ajay; Kim, Cecilia] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Urban Planning & Publ Policy, Irvine, CA 92697 USA. Garde, A (reprint author), Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Urban Planning & Publ Policy, Irvine, CA 92697 USA. E-Mail: agarde@uci.edu; cecilia.kim@uci.edu

摘要

Problem, research strategy, and findings: Advocates of form-based codes contend that these zoning regulations go beyond conventional zoning regulations in promoting sustainable development. We examine the extent to which form-based codes adopted by California cities differ from conventional zoning regulations in integrating 41 Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design for Neighborhood Development sustainability criteria (measured by the total number of criteria and the strength of each criterion included in regulations) using a multiple-case study of 26 cities in Southern California. We examine whether and how form-based codes adopted for specific development areas differ from the conventional zoning regulations they replaced and from the current conventional zoning regulations of matched cities. We find considerable variation among cities: Not all form-based codes in our study include more sustainability criteria to a stronger degree than conventional zoning regulations, but a) most form-based codes include more sustainability criteria than the conventional zoning regulations they replaced and those of matched cities, and b) the strongest form-based codes include more sustainability criteria to a stronger degree than the conventional zoning regulations they replaced and those of matched cities. We lack sufficient information to generalize; California, moreover, has many state laws requiring sustainable development. Our findings provide valuable insight for cities considering zoning reform to increase the sustainability of development.Takeaway for practice: Our findings suggest that form-based and conventional zoning regulations can each help cities integrate sustainability criteria into their development regulations. Our research offers positive examples of best practice in zoning reform and highlights missed opportunities for creating more sustainable communities. Cities considering zoning reform can consider these opportunities when reforming their codes to be more supportive of sustainable development.