打印

作者

Helen Toxopeus;Panagiota Kotsila;Marta Conde;Attila Katona;Alexander P.N. van der Jagt;Friedemann Polzin

来源

CITIES,Vol.105,Issue1,Article 102839

语言

英文

关键字

Hybrid governance;Environmental justice;Urban nature-based solutions;Public-private partnerships;Urban greening

作者单位

Utrecht School of Economics, Utrecht University, the Netherlands;Institute for Environmental Science and Technology (ICTA), Autonomous University of Barcelona, Spain;Public Policy Center, Department of Political and Social Science, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain;Central European University, Hungary;Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, the Netherlands;Barcelona Lab for Urban Environmental Justice and Sustainability, Spain;Sustainable Finance Lab, the Netherlands;Utrecht School of Economics, Utrecht University, the Netherlands;Institute for Environmental Science and Technology (ICTA), Autonomous University of Barcelona, Spain;Public Policy Center, Department of Political and Social Science, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain;Central European University, Hungary;Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, the Netherlands;Barcelona Lab for Urban Environmental Justice and Sustainability, Spain;Sustainable Finance Lab, the Netherlands

摘要

Hybrid (or multi-actor) governance has been identified as a key opportunity for upscaling urban nature-based solutions (referred to as urban NBS), representing a demand-driven and cost-effective realization of urban green infrastructure. However it is unclear how such hybrid governance affects the justice outcomes of urban NBS. Through six in-depth cases of urban NBS we show that hybrid governance can lead to both improvements and deterioration of distributional, procedural and recognition justice, depending on the hybrid governance choices. By exploring the tensions between these justice impacts we formulate three main policy implications for hybrid governance settings: the need for transparent decision-making on the distribution of costs and benefits; safeguarding public control over the urban NBS and the use of scientific expertise in combination with bottom-up consultation procedures to recognize both current and future voices.