《Could “holistic” area-based regeneration be effective for health improvement?》

打印
作者
Ade Kearns;Seemanti Ghosh;Phil Mason;Matt Egan
来源
HOUSING STUDIES,Vol.,Issue
语言
英文
关键字
作者单位
Urban Studies, School of Social & Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom ;Urban Studies, School of Social & Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom ;Urban Big Data Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom ;Faculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
摘要
Regeneration is intended to tackle the negative effects of area disadvantage. Studies of health impacts of regeneration over thirty years have produced mixed and inconsistent results. This study translates the theory of wider determinants of health into a framework of five residential environments that may be impacted by regeneration: physical; services; economic; social; and psychosocial. It uses repeat cross-sectional survey data across a decade to assess differential change in physical and mental health for residents of regeneration areas compared with other areas. Across the deprived areas in the study, all five types of environment are associated with mental health, but associations are fewer and less consistent for physical health. The results indicate a small negative association between living in a regeneration area and physical health and a modest positive association with mental health. Suggestions are made for how regeneration might become more holistic and effective as a public health intervention.