打印

作者

来源

CITIES,Vol.73,P.63-70

语言

英文

关键字

NIMBY; Knowledge-production; Public participation; Policy entrepreneur; Waste incineration; PUBLIC-PARTICIPATION; CONFLICT-MANAGEMENT; WASTE INCINERATOR; WIND ENERGY; SOCIAL GAP; CHINA; KNOWLEDGE; GOVERNANCE; POLITICS; COMPENSATION

作者单位

[Zheng, Guo] Renmin Univ China, Sch Publ Adm & Policy, Dept Urban Planning & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China. [Liu, Wei] Renmin Univ China, Sch Publ Adm & Policy, Inst Publ Policy & Publ Finance, Beijing, Peoples R China. Liu, W (reprint author), Renmin Univ China, Sch Publ Adm & Policy, Inst Publ Policy & Publ Finance, Beijing, Peoples R China. E-Mail: lw@ruc.edu.cn

摘要

At Asuwei and Liulitun in Beijing, two similar NIMBY facilities were proposed. Why did one incinerator survive, while the other was aborted? This article aims at explaining this puzzle and finding a solution to address the NIMBY problem that happens all across China today. With thorough comparative case studies, this article argues that a knowledge-based participation initiated by a policy entrepreneur from the public is helpful in addressing this problem.