打印

作者

来源

URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING,Vol.31,P.169-184

语言

英文

关键字

Urban green space; Residential sorting; Green space amenities; Stated attitudes; Brussels; URBAN FOREST AMENITIES; PUBLIC OPEN SPACE; CONTINGENT VALUATION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE; CHOICE EXPERIMENT; PARKS; PREFERENCES; RECREATION; RESID

作者单位

[Schindler, Mirjam] Univ Canterbury, Geospatial Res Inst, Private Bag 4800, Canterbury 8140, New Zealand. [Le Texier, Marion] Univ Rouen Normandie, UMR 6266, IDEES, Rouen, France. [Caruso, Geoffrey] Univ Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg. [Caruso, Geoffrey] LISER, Luxembourg, Luxembourg. Schindler, M (reprint author), Univ Canterbury, Geospatial Res Inst, Private Bag 4800, Canterbury 8140, New Zealand. E-Mail: mirjam.schindler@canterbury.ac.nz; marion.le-texier@univ-rouen.fr; geoffrey.caruso@uni.lu

摘要

Extensive evidence exists on the benefits provided by urban green space (UGS) but evidence is lacking about whether and how socio-economic benefits accrue to all residents or disproportionally depending on their socioeconomic status or residential location. We model joint effects of socio-economic and locational attributes on attitudes and use of UGS in Brussels (BE). The analysis is based on a survey conducted along an urban-suburban continuum with respondents sampled across non-park public space. Patterns of use are depicted by the frequency and the distance travelled to the most used UGS. Attitudes are analyzed along three dimensions: willingness to (i) pay for UGS, (ii) trade off housing for green space and (iii) substitute private for public green. Our results stress the importance of separating effects of attitudes from socio-economic and locational effects to quantify UGS use, and suggest endogenous effects of green space with residential sorting.