打印

作者

来源

URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING,Vol.29,P.348-356

语言

英文

关键字

Biodiversity; Ecosystem services; Green spaces; Remnant ecosystems; Urban landscapes; Wastelands; Wilderness; GREEN-SPACE; POTENTIAL CONTRIBUTION; WASTELAND VEGETATION; HUMAN HEALTH; VACANT LAND; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; DIVERSITY; SERVICES; CITIES

作者单位

[Threlfall, Caragh G.; Kendal, Dave] Univ Melbourne, Sch Ecosyst, Forest Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia. [Kendal, Dave] Univ Melbourne, Fac Architecture Bldg & Planning, Melbourne Sch Design, Thrive Res Hub, Melbourne, Vic, Australia. Kendal, D (reprint author), 500 Yarra Blvd, Richmond, Vic 3121, Australia. E-Mail: dkendal@unimelb.edu.au

摘要

There is global interest in increasing the complexity of urban ecosystems to benefit both people and nature in cities. However, to successfully plan for and manage more complex landscapes greater attention is needed on understanding the complementary role of different types of green spaces in cities. Wild spaces occur in many forms across the landscape. In this paper, we discuss the different social and ecological roles that wild urban spaces play in our cities, and how they vary across space and time. We then assess the role and benefits of wild urban spaces in relation to other types of green space. Wild spaces are spatially and temporally diverse, and can act as refuges when other green spaces are not available. Many important differences exist in the composition, structure and management of wild spaces in comparison with other kinds of green space that drive their unique contribution to urban ecosystems. This discussion paper highlights these differences, and brings together knowledge of the role of wild spaces in urban landscapes from a multidisciplinary perspective.