打印

作者

来源

来源 JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS,Vol.68,P.404-418

语言

英文

关键字

Q4;R2;R3;Greenhouse gases;Cities;Urban growth;Transportation;Electricity consumption;Regulation

作者单位

Harvard University and NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138, United States"}]},{"#name":"affiliation","$":{"id":"aff2;UCLA and NBER, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States"}]},{"#name":"correspondence","$":{"id":"cor1;Harvard University and NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138, United States"}]},"aff2":{"#name":"affiliation","$":{"id":"aff2;UCLA and NBER, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States"}]}},"correspondences":{"cor1":{"#name":"correspondence","$":{"id":"cor1

摘要

Carbon dioxide emissions may create significant social harm because of global warming, yet American urban development tends to be in low density areas with very hot summers. In this paper, we attempt to quantify the carbon dioxide emissions associated with new construction in different locations across the country. We look at emissions from driving, public transit, home heating, and household electricity usage. We find that the lowest emissions areas are generally in California and that the highest emissions areas are in Texas and Oklahoma. There is a strong negative association between emissions and land use regulations. By restricting new development, the cleanest areas of the country would seem to be pushing new development towards places with higher emissions. Cities generally have significantly lower emissions than suburban areas, and the city-suburb gap is particularly large in older areas, like New York.