打印

作者

Alexander Sasu;Graham Squires;Arshad Javed

来源

HABITAT INTERNATIONAL,Vol.130,P.102698

语言

英文

关键字

作者单位

School of Economics and Finance, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North, 4442, New Zealand;Department of Estate Management, Kumasi Technical University, Box 854, Kumasi, Ghana;School of Economics and Finance, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North, 4442, New Zealand;Department of Estate Management, Kumasi Technical University, Box 854, Kumasi, Ghana;College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Chongqing Jiaotong University, No.66 Xuefu Road, Nan'an District, Chongqing, 400074, China;WISSENSARCHITEKTUR-Laboratory of Knowledge Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, TU Dresden, Zellescher Weg 17, BZW-B 009, 01069, Dresden, Germany;Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific University, 1-1 Jumonjihara, Beppu, Oita, 874-8577, Japan;Graduate School of Science, Tohoku University, 6–3 Aramaki Aza Aoba, Aoba, Sendai, Miyagi, 980–8578, Japan;Key Laboratory of Watershed Geographic Sciences, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 73 East Beijing, Road, Nanjing, 210008, China;Department of Urban Planning, School of Architecture, Nanjing Tech University, 30 South Puzhu Road, Nanjing, 211816, Jiangsu, China;Urban Policy Laboratory, Department of Public Policy, School of Social and Policy Studies Gerson H Gordon Faculty of Social Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel;Centre for Environmental Research and Impact Studies, University of Bucharest, Nicolae Balcescu 1, 010041, Bucharest, Romania;Thomas More University of Applied Sciences, Zandpoortvest 60, 2800, Mechelen, Belgium;Habitat Unit, Technische Universität Berlin, Germany;School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, UK

摘要

The purpose of this paper is to review the literature on land banking and the functioning of land markets to identify possible areas for future research. The paper adopts a three-stage systematic review design process to evaluate and synthesise relevant extant literature sourced from academic databases like Scopus, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Directory of Open Access Journals, JSTOR, Hein Online and Wiley Online Library. The findings suggest a research pattern that concentrates largely on public land banking within the context of formal land markets and neo-classical theorisation. The findings further show that a generic outcome of land banking on the functioning of the land market is rarely established. Consequently, the need to pay attention to informal land markets and institutional economics theorisation under the domain of private and semi-public land banking has been identified as possible research areas for exploration. The review excludes contemporary interpretation of land banking in the US, which is usually limited to the domain of acquiring and converting tax delinquent, vacant and foreclosed properties into productive use. The paper advocates for the basis of exploring areas that have been largely neglected in the literature on land banking and the functioning of land markets.