打印

作者

Gabriella Allegretto;Dave Kendal;Emily J. Flies

来源

URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING,Vol.74,Issue1,Article 127664

语言

英文

关键字

作者单位

Review"}]},{"#name":"title","$":{"id":"tit0005"},"_":"A systematic review of the relationship between urban forest quality and socioeconomic status or race"}],"floats":[],"footnotes":[],"attachments":[]},"vol-first":"74","vol-iss-suppl-text":"Volume 74","userSettings":{"forceAbstract":false,"creditCardPurchaseAllowed":true,"blockFullTextForAnonymousAccess":false,"disableWholeIssueDownload":false,"preventTransactionalAccess":false,"preventDocumentDelivery":true},"contentType":"JL","crossmark":true,"document-references":89,"freeHtmlGiven":false,"ssoUrls":["//acw.sciencedirect.com/SSOCore/update?acw=33e417c49f11a0453e5b11206c789713a8d7gxrqa%7C%24%7CF781CE61D7206F61EF8C9DFC5D025678A665B54F0FC25052A5C1314A8A11E6623038568C2E4C0241A8038B5F3C52197200BA7878133C576F3FBA44D1BD4E4F2EB0469A67597464825D387A21AFA2E514&utt=b924-0475b23c281de29d3c5-99553b0817456c68","//acw.elsevier.com/SSOCore/update?acw=33e417c49f11a0453e5b11206c789713a8d7gxrqa%7C%24%7CF781CE61D7206F61EF8C9DFC5D025678A665B54F0FC25052A5C1314A8A11E6623038568C2E4C0241A8038B5F3C52197200BA7878133C576F3FBA44D1BD4E4F2EB0469A67597464825D387A21AFA2E514&utt=b924-0475b23c281de29d3c5-99553b0817456c68"],"userProfile":{"departmentName":"ScienceDirect Guests","accessType":"GUEST","accountId":"228598","webUserId":"12975512","accountName":"ScienceDirect Guests","departmentId":"291352","userType":"NORMAL","hasMultipleOrganizations":false},"access":{"openAccess":false,"openArchive":false},"aipType":"none","articleEntitlement":{"entitled":false,"isCasaUser":false,"usageInfo":"(12975512,U|291352,D|228598,A|3,P|2,PL)(SDFE,CON|33e417c49f11a0453e5b11206c789713a8d7gxrqa,SSO|ANON_GUEST,ACCESS_TYPE)"},"crawlerInformation":{"canCrawlPDFContent":false,"isCrawler":false},"dates":{"Available online":"30 June 2022","Received":"7 April 2021","Revised":["25 June 2022"],"Accepted":"28 June 2022","Publication date":"1 August 2022","Version of Record":"6 July 2022"},"displayViewFullText":false,"downloadFullIssue":false,"entitlementReason":"unsubscribed","hasBody":true,"hasScholarlyAbstract":true,"headerConfig":{"contactUrl":"https://service.elsevier.com/app/contact/supporthub/sciencedirect/","userName":"","userEmail":"","orgName":"ScienceDirect Guests","webUserId":"12975512","libraryBanner":{},"shib_regUrl":"","tick_regUrl":"","recentInstitutions":[],"canActivatePersonalization":false,"hasInstitutionalAssociation":false,"hasMultiOrg":false,"userType":"GUEST","userAnonymity":"ANON_GUEST","allowCart":true,"environment":"prod","cdnAssetsHost":"https://sdfestaticassets-us-east-1.sciencedirectassets.com"},"isCorpReq":false,"issn":"16188667","issn-primary-formatted":"1618-8667","issRange":"","isThirdParty":false,"pageCount":12,"pdfEmbed":false,"publication-content":{"noElsevierLogo":false,"imprintPublisher":{"displayName":"Urban & Fischer","id":"507"},"isSpecialIssue":false,"isSampleIssue":false,"transactionsBlocked":false,"publicationOpenAccess":{"oaStatus":"","oaArticleCount":181,"openArchiveStatus":false,"openArchiveArticleCount":0,"openAccessStartDate":"","oaAllowsAuthorPaid":true},"issue-cover":{"attachment":[{"attachment-eid":"1-s2.0-S1618866722X00071-cov200h.gif","file-basename":"cov200h","extension":"gif","filename":"cov200h.gif","ucs-locator":["https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/prod-ucs-content-store-eu-west/content/pii:S1618866722X00071/cover/DOWNSAMPLED200/image/gif/306fcd333299d47c4377930ba8a9b1d6/cov200h.gif"],"attachment-type":"IMAGE-COVER-H200","filesize":"10591","pixel-height":"200","pixel-width":"150"},{"attachment-eid":"1-s2.0-S1618866722X00071-cov150h.gif","file-basename":"cov150h","extension":"gif","filename":"cov150h.gif","ucs-locator":["https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/prod-ucs-content-store-eu-west/content/pii:S1618866722X00071/cover/DOWNSAMPLED/image/gif/6f77f659e3bfaa05eb2d0724ef5798db/cov150h.gif"],"attachment-type":"IMAGE-COVER-H150","filesize":"7434","pixel-height":"150","pixel-width":"113"}]},"smallCoverUrl":"https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/S16188667.gif","title":"urban-forestry-and-urban-greening","contentTypeCode":"JL","images":{"coverImage":"https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S1618866722X00071-cov150h.gif","logo":"https://sdfestaticassets-us-east-1.sciencedirectassets.com/prod/d496ee5a972fcb2095ef20186e103d21686c1fe8/image/elsevier-non-solus.png","logoAltText":"Elsevier"},"publicationCoverImageUrl":"https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S1618866722X00071-cov150h.gif"},"useEnhancedReader":true,"volRange":"74","features":["keywords","references","preview"],"titleString":"A systematic review of the relationship between urban forest quality and socioeconomic status or race","usesAbstractUrl":true,"renderingMode":"Preview","isAbstract":true,"isContentVisible":false,"ajaxLinks":{"authorMetadata":true},"eligibleForUniversalPdf":false},"authors":{"content":[{"#name":"author-group","$":{"id":"ag0005"},"$$":[{"#name":"author","$":{"id":"au0005","author-id":"S1618866722002072-0e2eb4e90b5c09892704343d4b98f0fa"},"$$":[{"#name":"given-name","_":"Gabriella;Healthy Landscapes Research Group, School of Geography, Planning and Spatial Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Australia;School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Australia;Healthy Landscapes Research Group, School of Geography, Planning and Spatial Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Australia;School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Australia;Chair for Forest Growth and Yield Science, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Hans-Carl-von-Carlowitz-Platz 2, Weihenstephan, Freising 85354, Germany;Department of Geomatics, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan;Department of Leisure Industry and Health Promotion, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei 112, Taiwan;National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli 35053, Taiwan;Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, United States;Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia;Victoria University, Institute for Health and Sport, Melbourne, Australia;Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia;Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium;Movement and Nutrition for Health and Performance Research Group, Department of Movement and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Physical Education and Physical Therapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium;Short communication"}]},{"#name":"title","$":{"id":"tit0005"},"_":"Adolescents’ perceptions of park characteristics that discourage park visitation"}],"floats":[],"footnotes":[],"attachments":[]},"openArchive":false,"openAccess":false,"document-subtype":"sco","content-family":"serial","contentType":"JL","abstract":{"$$":[{"$$":[{"$":{"id":"sect0005"},"#name":"section-title","_":"Abstract"},{"$$":[{"$":{"view":"all","id":"sp0040"},"#name":"simple-para","_":"Parks are key amenities of liveable cities that support physical activity and social interaction. However, parks are often not well attended by adolescents, and little is known about what park characteristics may discourage adolescents from visiting parks. The aim of this study was to explore what park characteristics adolescents perceive as most likely to discourage park visitation. Adolescents (n = 444, 13–18 years, 53% female) from seven schools in diverse areas of Melbourne, Australia completed an online survey at school. In response to an open-ended question, participants listed three park characteristics that would most likely discourage their park visitation. Content analysis was performed to determine categories of park characteristics from the coded responses. The six most frequently stated park characteristics that would discourage park visitation related to: play equipment (e.g., small/children’s playgrounds, no play equipment, no swings; 44% of participants mentioned the category at least once); social factors (e.g., crowded parks, presence of undesirable people; 32%); natural environment (e.g., small/no grassy space, large grassy open space; 28%); maintenance (e.g., dirty facilities, rubbish; 23%); sport/recreation features (e.g., skate park; 20%); and amenities (e.g., no shade, toilets, drink taps; 19%). To encourage more adolescents to increasingly visit parks, it is imperative for stakeholders to address the park features that they perceive as unappealing to ensure that park design caters to this important age group."}],"$":{"view":"all","id":"abs0010"},"#name":"abstract-sec"}],"$":{"view":"all","id":"ab0010","class":"author"},"#name":"abstract"}],"$":{"xmlns:ce":true,"xmlns:dm":true,"xmlns:sb":true},"#name":"abstracts"},"pdf":{"urlType":"download","url":"/science/article/pii/S1618866722002126/pdfft?md5=f884e81de81ce1765f494bbd7d55b6a2&pid=1-s2.0-S1618866722002126-main.pdf"},"iss-first":"","vol-first":"74","isThirdParty":false,"issn-primary-unformatted":"16188667","issn-primary-formatted":"1618-8667"},{"pii":"S1618866722001972","journalTitle":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","publicationYear":"2022","volumeSupText":"Volume 74","articleNumber":"127654","pageRange":"127654","trace-token":"AAAAQL38WiyCJeSn3MhPRsMytRcrd6GRZScKoArgifemIc-p_WjSqNJbCuoz_-xdK1XkmQsG9eahc1m2l8OeTW7F-gapWzNFC4PkUB_pJqS4D6wRYse-gQ","authors":{"content":[{"#name":"author-group","$":{"id":"ag0005"},"$$":[{"#name":"author","$":{"id":"au0005","author-id":"S1618866722001972-ad7e52abbdda43061b07b5475b84cee3"},"$$":[{"#name":"given-name","_":"Clive;Newcastle University, School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom;The University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy;University of Minnesota, College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences, 1420 Eckles Ave #190, St. Paul 55108, MN, United States

摘要

The quantity of urban forests in cities is critical for biodiversity conservation and human health, and is known to be distributed unequally. Increasingly, the quality of urban forests are also being recognised as shaping the benefits they provide. Previous studies and reviews have demonstrated that the quality of urban green spaces is associated with patterns of inequality as measured by socio-economic status and race (in the U.S). This study extends this body of knowledge to urban forests by systematically reviewing the urban forest literature (that explicitly study the urban forest) exploring the relationship between urban forest quality and both socio-economic status and race. Two academic databases (SCOPUS and Web of Science) were systematically searched. A total of 2012 papers were screened and 21 articles were included in this study. Almost all studies (20/21) found evidence of inequality, with at least one significant association between measures of urban forest quality and socio-economic status or race. However, 6 studies found contrasting patterns, with lower socioeconomic status areas having higher urban forest quality. There was variation in the type of ‘urban forest’ studied, and variation in the ways both urban forest quality and socio-economic status were measured, making inter-study comparisons difficult. Interestingly, the literature was geographically diverse, and future research could continue to focus on countries in Africa, South America and Asia with diverse needs for and uses of urban forests. In conclusion, this review finds evidence for inequity in the distribution of urban forest quality. Future research that more clearly describes the urban forests being studied and that explores sociocultural variation in perceived quality would allow better generalisation and understanding of forest quality patterns.