打印

作者

Carl Grodach;Chris Gibson

来源

URBAN POLICY AND RESEARCH,Vol.37,Issue3,P.279-293

语言

英文

关键字

Advanced manufacturing,craft,economic development,industrial policy,urban manufacturing,urban planning,urban policy

作者单位

Monash Urban Planning & Design, Monash University, Caulfield East, Australia

摘要

Advocates argue that urban manufacturing holds potential to promote locally distinctive enterprises, quality employment and more socially-inclusive forms of urban development. However, little is known how urban policy actually supports manufacturing. This paper documents the policy response to urban manufacturing in the U.S. and Australia. We determine how policy documents conceptualise manufacturing and define goals and strategy around land use, business development and workforce development. The analysis demonstrates that manufacturing policy is situated between entrenched visions of deindustrialisation and emerging notions of a renewed, advanced manufacturing sector and that most cities struggle to address the inherent challenges of this condition.有论者认为城市制造业能够促进地方特色企业的发展，提高就业质量，使城市发展更具社会包容性。然而对于城市政策如何支持制造业，人们知之甚少。本文梳理了美国和澳大利亚针对城市制造业的政策，探究政策文件如何塑造制造业理念，并决定土地使用、商业发展和劳动力开发诸方面的目标和策略。分析显示制造业政策处于去工业化的狭窄视界和新一代制造业的新理念的夹缝之中，大多数城市都在努力应对这种局面带来的内在挑战。KEYWORDS: Advanced manufacturing, craft, economic development, industrial policy, urban manufacturing, urban planning, urban policyAdditional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Australian Research Council [grant DP170104255].Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.