《Investigating the benefits of ‘leftover’ places: Residents’ use and perceptions of an informal greenspace in Melbourne》

打印
作者
Leila Mahmoudi Farahani;Cecily Maller
来源
URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING,Vol.41,Issue1,Pages 292-302
语言
英文
关键字
Informal greenspace;Greening;Perception;Use;Planning;Landscape architecture
作者单位
Clean Air and Urban Landscapes Hub, Centre for Urban Research, RMIT University, Building 8, Level 11, 360 Swanston Street, Melbourne VIC 3000, Australia;Clean Air and Urban Landscapes Hub, Centre for Urban Research, RMIT University, Building 8, Level 11, 360 Swanston Street, Melbourne VIC 3000, Australia
摘要
Urban greenspaces play a key role in the health and wellbeing and quality of life of residents. Several studies have documented the physiological, environmental and social benefits of parks and formal greenspaces for urban dwellers. The contribution of informal greenspaces and their potential uses and benefits, however, have received very little attention in extant research. Informal greenspaces are found in a variety of forms and types including vacant lots, railway or waterway verges and brownfields. Drawing on an empirical study of Upper Stony Creek in Sunshine North, Melbourne, this paper examines how residents perceive and use informal greenspaces. Upper Stony Creek is a concreted drainage channel with limited access from the residential area. An informal greenspace of around 40,000 square metres is located towards the east of the Creek. Drawing on systematic observations and interviews with local residents, the study examined how residents engaged with and benefited from the presence of informal greenspaces in their neighbourhood. The findings showed that not only did residents use the accessible greenspace, but also they were using channel verges fenced-off at the time. The activities varied based on season and the level of maintenance. Dog walking was the main activity conducted in the informal greenspace, and the lack of regular maintenance, perceptions of unsafety and littering were among the most critical concerns regarding its use. The paper concludes by recommending ways informal greenspaces can be managed and improved to add value to urban environments and fully capitalise on their potential as integral parts of neighbourhoods that can contribute to liveability.