打印

作者

来源

EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES,Vol.27,Issue2SI,P.282-299

语言

英文

关键字

Urban; climate change; experiment; governance; effect; Denmark; GOVERNANCE; INNOVATION; ENERGY; SUSTAINABILITY; TRANSITIONS; GEOGRAPHY; POLITICS

作者单位

[Madsen, Stine Hach Juul; Hansen, Teis] Lund Univ, Dept Human Geog, Lund, Sweden. [Madsen, Stine Hach Juul; Hansen, Teis] Lund Univ, CIRCLE, Lund, Sweden. [Hansen, Teis] Nord Inst Studies Innovat Res & Educ NIFU, Oslo, Norway. Hansen, T (reprint author), Lund Univ, Dept Human Geog, Lund, Sweden.; Hansen, T (reprint author), Lund Univ, CIRCLE, Lund, Sweden.; Hansen, T (reprint author), Nord Inst Studies Innovat Res & Educ NIFU, Oslo, Norway. E-Mail: teis.hansen@keg.lu.se

标签

城市可持续发展,城市气候 | 其他

摘要

This paper contributes to the literature on urban climate change experiments by analysing ascribed advantages and challenges of organizing climate change experiments at the urban scale, and by examining how local actions translate into effect. We here distinguish between effects of experiments in achieving actual sustainability gains ('goal-oriented objectives') and instigating broader institutional change ('process-oriented objectives'). Empirically, we analyse efforts related to energy supply in two Danish urban climate change experiments: The 'CPH 2025 Climate Plan' in Copenhagen, and 'ProjectZero' in Sonderborg. Our analysis poses considerable question marks over the importance of the advantages ascribed to urban climate change experiments including 'authority advantages' and possibilities of 'engaging and mobilizing stakeholders'. 本文通过分析在城市范围内组织气候变化实验的优势和挑战，并通过研究当地行动如何产生影响，为城市气候变化实验的研究做出贡献。我们在这里区分实验对实现可持续实现收益的影响（“目标导向目标”）和促进更广泛的制度变革的影响（“过程导向目标”）两类。从实证出发，我们分析了两个丹麦城市气候变化实验中与能源供应相关的工作：哥本哈根的“哥本哈根2025气候计划”（CPH 2025 Climate Plan）和森纳堡的“零企划”（ProjectZero）。我们的分析对城市气候变化实验优势的重要性提出了相当大的质疑，包括“权威优势”以及“吸引和动员利益相关者”的可能性。